ArticleBMJ open2025
Curating a knowledge base for patients with neurosyphilis: a study protocol of a DEep learning Framework for pErsonalized prediction of Adverse prognosTic events in NeuroSyphilis (DEFEAT-NS).
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdverse prognostic events (APE) of neurosyphilis include ongoing syphilitic meningitis, meningovascular syphilis, parenchymatous neurosyphilis and death. Its complexity and rarity have the potential to result in the underestimated true burden of neurosyphilis worldwide, due to lack of recognition and under-reporting. The unmet need for a modern method of refined and targeted treatment of neurosyphilis is strengthened by the currently various distinct diagnostic criteria. The DEep learning Framework for pErsonalized prediction of Adverse prognosTic events in NeuroSyphilis study will develop and validate prediction models for personalised prediction of APE after initial diagnosis in neurosyphilis to aid shared decision-making and stratify care of patients with neurosyphilis at high risk of severe prognostic course. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We conducted formative research to conceptualise and design a robust and clinically acceptable deep learning framework. We will conduct a deep learning framework development and validation study using a retrospective, multicentre, longitudinal cohort design and applying unsupervised, semi-supervised machine learning and deep learning. It will be conducted following expert guidance for model development and validation and our previous research experience. This study design consists of six parts: development, calibration, validation, subgroup bias evaluation, clinical utility evaluation and explanation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Harmonised Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice of the International Conference on Harmonisation. No patient will be directly involved in developing the study's research question, design and implementation. This study will be a retrospective analysis of already anonymised data; therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were waived by the institutional review board of School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.