Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40680789›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2026

[Setting up of practices by general practitioners in Bavaria with a special focus on bureaucratic processes].

Fabian Walter, Katharina Maier, Marco Roos, Klara Lorenz-Dant

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabian WalterAllgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Katharina MaierAllgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Marco RoosAllgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1596-5908
Klara Lorenz-DantAllgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for GP care is increasing while the number of GPs is decreasing. We investigated how GPs perceive bureaucracy during the process of establishing their own practice and how this perception changes with increasing establishment experience.Physicians who wished to set up a practice or who were in the process of setting up a practice and those who, up to two years and two to five years previously, had set up a GP practice were interviewed digitally following an interview guide. The recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun & Clarkes Thematic Analysis.The 18 interviewees identified "bureaucracy" in various areas unrelated to patient care. A habituation effect occurs after the practice has been established. Resources for coping with bureaucratic challenges were mentioned.The participants define bureaucracy as any activity that is distant from the patient. Dealing with this should be made easier despite the habituation that occurs. Electronic processes and support through advice can help to overcome bureaucratic hurdles, and positive examples mentioned should be systematised. GPs view bureaucracy as a hurdle to setting up a practice, but it does not influence their decision to establish their own practice. Therefore, while still relevant, bureaucracy is found to be less important than previous research suggests.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersPractice Patterns, Physicians'GermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID40680789
PMCPMC12885622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.