ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2025
[Promoting cooperation between public health services and academic institutions in research: Experiences from the BMG-funded collaborative research project Infektionsschutz.Neu.Gestalten (I.N.Ge)].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 2018 mission statement of the ÖGD emphasises the importance of scientific research and cooperation with scientific institutions. In 2020, the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) took up this aspect in a call for proposals to strengthen cooperation between the ÖGD and public health research. In the context of this call, the research network 'Infektionsschutz.Neu.Gestalten (I.N.Ge)' was established with four health authorities and one university (funding period: 09/2021-08/2024). The aim was to improve the evidence-based work of the ÖGD in the field of health and infection protection. Digitalisation, quality assurance, risk communication and special groups were examined using the example of infection control in the COVID-19 pandemic. A participatory, transformative approach with real-world laboratories and experiments was used. Lessons for successful cooperation between public health and university institutions were drawn from the intensive collaboration. Important were appropriate frameworks, targeted resource planning and clear role definitions. Issues were identified that could make future collaboration more effective and sustainable. The resulting recommendations for action are intended, among other things, to support the conception of joint research projects. I.N.Ge showed that improved framework conditions were necessary for increased cooperation. Funding projects should allow for flexible cooperation models that adapt to the specific resources and competencies of the partners. Forward-looking resource planning was determined to be essential - including job calculations, substitution arrangements and additional capacity for induction or methodological adaptation. Clear roles and responsibilities should be defined at the tendering stage to create transparency and optimise implementation. I.N.Ge emphasized the need to promote cooperation between the ÖGD and academic institutions in order to further develop and strengthen the public health service. I.N.Ge emphasises that cooperation between the ÖGD and academic institutions must be encouraged in order to further develop and strengthen the ÖGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.