ReviewPhysiological measurement2025
Physics-informed neural networks for physiological signal processing and modeling: a narrative review.
Review in Physiological measurement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An informed monotone neural network for multi-stage chronic kidney disease prediction with integrated GFR estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Axon as a Self-Modifying Computational System: Autonomous Inference, Adaptive Propagation, and AI-Enabled Mechanistic Insight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The future of mathematical oncology in the age of AI.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Pulsatile Flow Modeling and Targeted Drug Delivery Optimization in Computational Hemodynamics.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Harnessing Nonlinear Mechanics to Transform Medical Diagnostics.Applied mechanics reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a transformative approach to data models by incorporating known physical laws into neural network training, thereby improving model generalizability, reduce data dependency, and enhance interpretability. Like many other fields in engineering and science, the analysis of physiological signals has been influenced by PINNs in recent years. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of PINNs from various perspectives in the physiological signal analysis domain. After exploring the literature and screening the search results, more than 40 key studies in the related domain are selected and categorized based on both practically and theoretically significant perspectives, including input data types, applications, physics-informed models, and neural network architectures. While the advantages of PINNs in tackling forward and inverse problems in physiological signal contexts are highlighted, challenges such as noisy inputs, computational complexity, loss function types, and overall model configuration are discussed, providing insights into future research directions and improvements. This work can serve as a guiding resource for researchers exploring PINNs in biomedical and physiological signal processing, paving the way for more precise, data-efficient, and clinically relevant solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.