ArticleLancet (London, England)2025
Tracking development assistance for health, 1990-2030: historical trends, recent cuts, and outlook.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global coverage of interventions for reduction of injecting drug use-related harm, HIV, viral hepatitis and tuberculosis in prisons and other carceral settings: A systematic review.The International journal on drug policy · 2026Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analyses of promoting handwashing with soap: A systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of official development assistance for health on health outcomes: a rapid systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2026Pooled it
- From continental strategy to country implementation: a document-based scorecard for assessing health security and sovereignty readiness in Africa.Global health action · 2026Article
- Aging rises, yet the double burden of illness remains.Nature aging · 2026Article
- Measuring the composition and availability of human resources for health by sex in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2023, and workforce gaps for universal health coverage: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.The Lancet. Public health · 2026Article
- Leveraging the private sector for health system development in sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Japan's global health engagement in the Western Pacific: diagnosing structural inertia and a framework for human security diplomacy.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Strengthening women's leadership in health systems through innovation and intersectionality.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- You aren't going to like what comes after America: Europe and global health after 2025.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Polio transition in the African Region: progress, challenges and prospects for health systems integration.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Global Aid Cuts and Local Health Consequences in Nakivale Refugee Settlement, Uganda.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Do Fossil Fuel Subsidies Crowd Out Health Expenditure? A Country-Level Longitudinal Analysis.Health economics · 2026Article
- Cardiometabolic Health of Healthcare Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Overlooked Priority.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- US Presidential Party switches are mirrored in global maternal mortality.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Path dependence in immunisation programmes and how implementation science can guide system reform towards self-reliance in Africa.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Temporal trends and associations between domestic public health spending, donor funding and tuberculosis outcomes in Africa: a serial cross-sectional study (1990-2022).BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Financing fragility and pandemic preparedness in Central Asia: a policy review of aid volatility, donor dynamics, and health system resilience.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Using implementation science to bridge the gaps between political commitment and action in antimicrobial resistance governance under the one health approach in the WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Unlocking potential: Development finance reforms needed to support localized health product manufacturing.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopment assistance for health (DAH) rose to its highest levels during the COVID-19 pandemic but has since reduced amid rising global economic uncertainty and competing fiscal demands. In early 2025, major donors including the USA and the UK announced substantial reductions in aid, prompting concerns about the future of health financing in middle-income and low-income countries. To date, no comprehensive assessment has quantified the effects of these announced cuts on overall DAH levels or its future trajectories.
methodsWe estimated DAH from 1990 to 2030, drawing from a wide range of data sources including the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Creditor Reporting System database, online databases of agencies such as The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (Gavi), and financial reports from private philanthropies and non-governmental organisations. Disbursements were categorised by source, disbursing agency, health focus area, and recipient country using standardised keyword tagging methods developed over 15 years of Institute For Health Metrics and Evaluation Financing Global Health reports. For 2025, we incorporated budget cuts announced by major donors to develop preliminary estimates. Forecasts to 2030 used donor-specific funding targets and linear regression models. Additional refinements for this iteration of our DAH tracking included expanded donor coverage and disaggregation of health areas for additional disbursing entities.
findingsDAH peaked at US$80·3 billion in 2021 and fell to $49·6 billion in 2024. In 2025, announced budget cuts-particularly reductions in US bilateral aid-are expected to contribute to further declines in global DAH to $38·4 billion, amounts last seen in 2009. Key global health institutions (eg, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and US Agency for International Development and Agence Française) providing DAH for key infectious diseases and childhood vaccines will contract their own disbursements. Because these key multilateral development banks have been protected from the major funding cuts, the World Bank has increased its relative share of total DAH disbursements. Forecasts indicate continued stagnation in DAH until 2030 under current policies, reaching $36·2 billion in 2030. Our sensitivity analyses suggest that our estimate for 2025 could range from $36·8 billion in a pessimistic scenario to $40·0 billion in an optimistic scenario, based on changes in US cuts. Similarly, in the next 5 years, total DAH is expected to reach $37·8 billion in 2030 under a positive scenario for US contribution and $34·5 billion under a negative scenario for US contribution.
interpretationThe global health financing landscape is entering a period of sustained cuts. Major reductions in DAH, particularly from historically leading donors, threaten to widen health disparities unless mitigated by increased domestic resource mobilisation or alternative financing mechanisms. This study highlights the urgent need for greater efficiency, strategic reprioritisation, and strengthened fiscal resilience in recipient countries to safeguard the substantial global health gains of the previous three decades.
fundingGates Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.