Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40680759›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2025

Tracking development assistance for health, 1990-2030: historical trends, recent cuts, and outlook.

Angela E Apeagyei, Catherine Bisignano, Hans Elliott, Simon I Hay, Brendan Lidral-Porter, Seong Nam, Carolyn Shyong, Golsum Tsakalos, Bianca S Zlavog, Enis Barış and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angela E ApeagyeiInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: amicah@uw.edu.
Catherine BisignanoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Hans ElliottInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Simon I HayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brendan Lidral-PorterInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Seong NamInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Carolyn ShyongInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Golsum TsakalosInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bianca S ZlavogInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Enis BarışInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christopher J L MurrayInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph L DielemanInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopment assistance for health (DAH) rose to its highest levels during the COVID-19 pandemic but has since reduced amid rising global economic uncertainty and competing fiscal demands. In early 2025, major donors including the USA and the UK announced substantial reductions in aid, prompting concerns about the future of health financing in middle-income and low-income countries. To date, no comprehensive assessment has quantified the effects of these announced cuts on overall DAH levels or its future trajectories.

methodsWe estimated DAH from 1990 to 2030, drawing from a wide range of data sources including the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Creditor Reporting System database, online databases of agencies such as The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (Gavi), and financial reports from private philanthropies and non-governmental organisations. Disbursements were categorised by source, disbursing agency, health focus area, and recipient country using standardised keyword tagging methods developed over 15 years of Institute For Health Metrics and Evaluation Financing Global Health reports. For 2025, we incorporated budget cuts announced by major donors to develop preliminary estimates. Forecasts to 2030 used donor-specific funding targets and linear regression models. Additional refinements for this iteration of our DAH tracking included expanded donor coverage and disaggregation of health areas for additional disbursing entities.

findingsDAH peaked at US$80·3 billion in 2021 and fell to $49·6 billion in 2024. In 2025, announced budget cuts-particularly reductions in US bilateral aid-are expected to contribute to further declines in global DAH to $38·4 billion, amounts last seen in 2009. Key global health institutions (eg, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and US Agency for International Development and Agence Française) providing DAH for key infectious diseases and childhood vaccines will contract their own disbursements. Because these key multilateral development banks have been protected from the major funding cuts, the World Bank has increased its relative share of total DAH disbursements. Forecasts indicate continued stagnation in DAH until 2030 under current policies, reaching $36·2 billion in 2030. Our sensitivity analyses suggest that our estimate for 2025 could range from $36·8 billion in a pessimistic scenario to $40·0 billion in an optimistic scenario, based on changes in US cuts. Similarly, in the next 5 years, total DAH is expected to reach $37·8 billion in 2030 under a positive scenario for US contribution and $34·5 billion under a negative scenario for US contribution.

interpretationThe global health financing landscape is entering a period of sustained cuts. Major reductions in DAH, particularly from historically leading donors, threaten to widen health disparities unless mitigated by increased domestic resource mobilisation or alternative financing mechanisms. This study highlights the urgent need for greater efficiency, strategic reprioritisation, and strengthened fiscal resilience in recipient countries to safeguard the substantial global health gains of the previous three decades.

fundingGates Foundation.

Indexed as

Financing, OrganizedGlobal HealthInternational CooperationDeveloping Countries

Identifiers

PMID40680759
PMCPMC12439094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.