Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40680713›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hygiene and environmental health2025

Identifying differences in U.S. exposure to ubiquitous carcinogens.

Adam Theising, Tina Bardot, Ann Wolverton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam TheisingU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America. Electronic address: theising.adam@epa.gov.
Tina BardotU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America.
Ann WolvertonU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death in the United States, and substantial race-, ethnicity-, sex-, and income-based differences in cancer incidence and mortality persist despite declining overall trends. Underlying differences in exposure to carcinogenic chemicals are often cited as a contributing factor to persistent differences in the incidence of certain cancer types. In this exploratory analysis, we construct a novel database of actual or potential exposure to ubiquitous carcinogenic chemicals based on nationally-representative biomonitoring and environmental data to produce demographically-differentiated exposure statistics, where possible. Despite major data gaps - one or more measures of direct or indirect exposure were available for only 37% of these 622 carcinogens - our results show evidence of notable differences in exposure for at least 28 carcinogens. We also review readily-available information on associated exposure pathways and cancer types for carcinogens with differences in exposure to identify common pathways through which households may be exposed, and explore correlations between relative exposure levels and cancer incidence rates. We end the paper with a discussion of key data gaps and limitations that future data gathering and research could address.

Indexed as

CarcinogensCarcinogens, EnvironmentalEnvironmental ExposureNeoplasmsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansIncidenceUnited StatesCarcinogensCarcinogens, EnvironmentalAir exposureBiomonitoringDrinking water exposureEnvironmental chemicalsIncomeRace/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID40680713
PMCPMC13142234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.