ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
Breaking data silos: incorporating the DICOM imaging standard into the OMOP CDM to enable multimodal research.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Agentic AI for scaling diagnosis and care in neurodegenerative disease.Nature aging · 2026Review
- Comparison and image analysis of different file formats on whole-slide images for colorectal and non-small cell lung carcinomas.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Extending the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model to Support Observational Peripheral Vascular Disease Research.The Journal of surgical research · 2026Observational
- Data harmonization processes of cancer data into the observational medical outcomes partnership common data model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis work incorporates the Digital Imaging Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Standard into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model (OMOP CDM) to standardize and accurately represent imaging studies, such as acquisition parameters, in multimodal research studies. MATERIALS AND
methodsDICOM is the internationally adopted standard that defines entities and relationships for biomedical imaging data used for clinical imaging studies. Most of the complexity in the DICOM data structure centers around the metadata. This metadata contains information about the patient and the modality acquisition parameters. We parsed the DICOM vocabularies in Parts 3, 6, and 16 to obtain structured metadata definitions and added these as custom concepts in the OMOP CDM vocabulary. To validate our pipeline, we harvested and transformed DICOM metadata from magnetic resonance images in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study.
resultsWe extracted and added 5183 attributes and 3628 coded values from the DICOM standard as custom concepts to the OMOP CDM vocabulary. We ingested 545 ADNI imaging studies containing 4756 series and harvested 691 224 metadata values. They were filtered, transformed, and loaded in the OMOP CDM imaging extension using the OMOP concepts for the DICOM attributes and values. DISCUSSION: This work is adaptable to clinical DICOM data. Future work will validate scalability and incorporate outcomes from automated analysis to provide a complete characterization research study within the OMOP framework.
conclusionThe incorporation of medical imaging into clinical observational studies has been a barrier to multi model research. This work demonstrates detailed phenotypes and paves the way for observational multimodal research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.