Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40680231›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2025

Circulating Tumor DNA detection in cancer: a comprehensive overview of current detection methods and prospects.

Ana Regina de Abreu, Ayla Wyninckx, Timon Vandamme, Ken Op de Beeck, Guy Van Camp, Marc Peeters, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Julien Taieb, Valerie Taly, Leonor Benhaim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Association of ctDNAJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Regina de AbreuCenter of Medical Genetics, Center for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem 2650, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6830-7891
Ayla WyninckxCenter of Medical Genetics, Center for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem 2650, Belgium.
Timon VandammeCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp 2650, Belgium.
Ken Op de BeeckCenter of Medical Genetics, Center for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem 2650, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-6838
Guy Van CampCenter of Medical Genetics, Center for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem 2650, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5105-9000
Marc PeetersCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp 2650, Belgium.
Pierre Laurent-PuigÉquipe labélisée Ligue Nationale contre le cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5096, Université de Paris, Paris 75005, France.
Julien TaiebÉquipe labélisée Ligue Nationale contre le cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5096, Université de Paris, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9955-4753
Valerie TalyÉquipe labélisée Ligue Nationale contre le cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5096, Université de Paris, Paris 75005, France.
Leonor BenhaimÉquipe labélisée Ligue Nationale contre le cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UMR-S1138, CNRS SNC5096, Université de Paris, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3948-4156

Funding

University of Antwerp 40790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete oveview of ctDNA detection methods.The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a major minimally invasive biomarker in oncology. Numerous methods exist for ctDNA detection and should be selected based on the specific oncological context. PCR-based methods are often preferred for their sensitivity and cost-effectiveness; however, they are limited to a narrower range of genes. In contrast, NGS-based methods enable comprehensive cancer genotyping and more efficient identification of actionable mutations. Moreover, the growing number of emerging approaches, such as third--generation sequencing and fragmentomics, highlights the increasing technical complexity of ctDNA detection. Overall, this review provides insights into the advantages and limitations of various detection strategies that can help improve clinical care for patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNANeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcancerclinical applicationctDNAdetectionliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40680231
PMCPMC12450317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.