ArticleJMIR AI2025
Natural Language Processing for Identification of Hospitalized People Who Use Drugs: Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Identifying Social Determinants of Health in Low-Income Populations Within United States Health Systems: A Scoping Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Natural Language Processing for Substance Use Disorder Information Extraction: A Systematic Literature Review.Current addiction reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People who use drugs (PWUD) are at heightened risk of severe injection-related infections. Current research relies on billing codes to identify PWUD-a methodology with suboptimal accuracy that may underestimate the economic, racial, and ethnic diversity of hospitalized PWUD. Objective: The goal of this study is to examine the impact of natural language processing (NLP) on enhancing identification of PWUD in electronic medical records, with a specific focus on determining improved systems of identifying populations who may previously been missed, including people who have low income or those from racially and ethnically minoritized populations. Methods: Health informatics specialists assisted in querying a cohort of likely PWUD hospital admissions at Tufts Medical Center between 2020-2022 using the following criteria: (1) ICD-10 codes indicative of drug use, (2) positive drug toxicology results, (3) prescriptions for medications for opioid use disorder, and (4) applying NLP-detected presence of "token" keywords in the electronic medical records likely indicative of the patient being a PWUD. Hospital admissions were split into two groups: highly documented (all four criteria present) and minimally documented (NLP-only). These groups were examined to assess the impact of race, ethnicity, and social vulnerability index. With chart review as the "gold standard," the positive predictive value was calculated. Results: The cohort included 4548 hospitalization admissions, with broad heterogeneity in how people entered the cohort and subcohorts; a total of 288 hospital admissions entered the cohort through NLP token presence alone. NLP demonstrated a 54% positive predictive value, outperforming biomarkers, prescription for medications for opioid use disorder, and ICD codes in identifying hospitalizations of PWUD. Additionally, NLP significantly enhanced these methods when integrated into the identification algorithm. The study also found that people from racially and ethnically minoritized communities and those with lower social vulnerability index were significantly more likely to have lower rates of PWUD-related documentation. Conclusions: NLP proved effective in identifying hospitalizations of PWUD, surpassing traditional methods. While further refinement is needed, NLP shows promising potential in minimizing health care disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.