ArticlePloS one2025
A comparative analysis of the impact of different treatments on Luffa Cylindrica fiber tensile properties.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing demand for environmentally friendly materials as alternatives to synthetic fibers, which pose significant environmental hazards due to their non-biodegradability. Natural fibers, such as Luffa Cylindrica, have gained attention due to their sustainability, lightweight properties, and biodegradability. However, their poor mechanical performance in composite applications limits their widespread use. The novelty of this study lies in the exploration of various treatments aimed at improving the tensile properties of Luffa Cylindrica fibers (LCFs), a relatively under-explored natural fiber. The research investigates the effects of immersion treatments in mineral water, seawater, vinegar (CH₃COOH), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃), and ethanol (C₂H₆O) on the tensile strength, surface morphology, and absorption properties of these fibers. The study highlights that untreated LCFs exhibit superior tensile strength (5.59 MPa) compared to treated fibers. Additionally, the statistical analysis utilizing two-parameter Weibull distribution offers novel insights into the mechanical properties of treated LCFs, confirming significant variations in fiber behavior with different treatments. This study contributes to the understanding of surface modifications that enhance the performance of Luffa Cylindrica fibers in composite materials, a promising step towards their industrial application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.