ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Enhanced rabies surveillance in roadkill specimens by real-time RT-PCR.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rabies and Pinnipeds Reviewed: Premonitions, Perturbations, and Projections?Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Roadkill specimens are an important source of samples for enhanced rabies surveillance (ERS) in areas where other methods of sample collection may not be practical. However, the physical condition of roadkill specimens is unpredictable and, in many circumstances, unsatisfactory for rabies diagnostic testing by antigen detection methods. The high sensitivity of real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) holds promise for rabies diagnostic testing of poor-quality samples. We conducted an evaluation of real-time RT-PCR to detect rabies virus RNA in roadkill samples. A total of 299 specimens were collected from raccoons (n = 232), skunks (n = 46), foxes (n = 17), coyotes (n = 2), a bobcat (n = 1), and a domestic cat (n = 1) across ten states during 2018 - 2021 in the United States. Eight samples (2.7%) were positive using the LN34 pan-lyssavirus real-time RT-PCR assay. These eight rabid animals in areas of high interest for wildlife rabies management would likely not have been identified otherwise. These findings support the use of real-time RT-PCR for samples that would typically be unsuitable for testing by widely used antigenic-based detection methods such as the direct fluorescent antibody test (DFA or FAT) and direct rapid immunohistochemistry test (DRIT).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.