Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40680074›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Analysis of gunshot damage to the porcine femur in a human thigh model using 5.5 mm airgun pellet: 3D reconstruction of gunshot injuries.

Mateusz Wilk, Małgorzata Chowaniec, Elżbieta Chowaniec, Grzegorz Bajor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mateusz WilkCollegium Medicum, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-7774
Małgorzata ChowaniecDepartment of Anatomy, Medical Faculty in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Elżbieta ChowaniecGC Adwokaci Gradowska Chowaniec Partnership, Czeladź, Poland.
Grzegorz BajorDepartment of Anatomy, Medical Faculty in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of advanced air rifles available on the market is comparable to that of small-calibre firearms. The airgun market offers airgun pellets that vary in weight, shape, calibre and material. In view of the ease of airguns tuning, a study of the gunshot damage to the anterior surface of the porcine femoral shaft was carried out with shots fired from a 5.5 mm calibre air rifle. An original human thigh model using a pig femur embedded in ballistic gellatine was used in the study. Gunshot damage was inflicted by firing Haendler&Natterman Baracuda, HollowPoint, Spitzkugel and Excite Apollo 5.5 mm airgun pellets from an Air Arms s410 Hi-Power Xtra FAC 5.5 mm calibre PCP air rifle. Measurements of the velocity and impact energy of the pellets as well as the extent of the bone and periosteal entry damage were taken. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences between pellets with regard to dimensions of gunshot damage to the shafts of the femur. Selected models were subjected to CT imaging.

Indexed as

FemurFirearmsForensic BallisticsImaging, Three-DimensionalThighWounds, GunshotAnimalsHumansSwine

Identifiers

PMID40680074
PMCPMC12273974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.