ArticlePloS one2025
Optimization of the prostaglandin F2α receptor for structural biology.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostaglandin F2ɑ (PGF2ɑ) is a bioactive lipid derived from arachidonic acid and is involved in many physiological and pathophysiological processes, such as parturition, vascular tone regulation, glaucoma and inflammation. It acts by binding to the Prostaglandin F2ɑ receptor (FP), a G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) that mediates signaling events by engaging intracellular heterotrimeric G protein effectors. The orthosteric binding site of lipid-binding receptors displays greater efficacy-dependent plasticity that hinders the design of ligands. Solving the structure of FP with ligands of different efficacies at an atomic level is important to fully understand its mechanism of activation and inhibition. Most purified FP-ligand complexes are unstable in vitro. The development of new X-ray crystallography and single particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) strategies to understand receptors' signal transduction requires improved purification yield and in vitro stability of the receptor. Here, we present a protein engineering effort to optimize the FP protein sequence for use in structural biology. Strategies involve protein insertion sites in the third intracellular loop (ICL3), N-terminal and C-terminal deletions, and single-point mutations that favorably affect receptor purification yield and stability in vitro. The best FP construct displays a yield of 1.5 mg/L and a stability of 59oC, which constitute a threefold improvement in purification yield and 9oC increase in stability over the wild-type receptor. These modifications in the receptor are suitable for pursuing alternative strategies for improving FP purification yield and for studying FP binding efficacy to its ligands through structural biology approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.