ArticlePloS one2025
DNA sequence classification for diabetes mellitus using NuSVC and XGBoost: A comparative.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Classification of different light colors applied during the incubation period based on small intestine morphology with XGBoost algorithm.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes Mellitus is a global health concern, characterized by high blood sugar levels over a prolonged period, leading to severe complications if left unmanaged. The early identification of individuals at risk is critical for effective intervention and treatment. Traditional diagnostic methods rely heavily on clinical symptoms and biochemical tests, which may not capture the underlying genetic predispositions. With the advent of genomics, DNA sequence analysis has emerged as a promising approach to uncover the genetic markers associated with Diabetes Mellitus. However, the challenge lies in accurately classifying DNA sequences to predict susceptibility to the disease, given the complex nature of genetic data. This study addresses this challenge by employing two advanced machine learning models, NuSVC (Nu-Support Vector Classification) and XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting), to classify DNA sequences related to Diabetes Mellitus. The dataset, obtained from reputable sources like NCBI, was preprocessed using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, where DNA sequences were treated as textual data and transformed into numerical features using TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency). To handle the class imbalance in the dataset, SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique) was applied. The models were trained and validated using 10-fold cross-validation. XGBoost was trained with up to 300 boosting rounds, and performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and log loss. The results demonstrate that XGBoost outperformed NuSVC across all metrics, achieving an accuracy of 98%, a log loss of 0.0650, and an AUC of 1.00, compared to NuSVC's accuracy of 87%, log loss of 0.2649, and AUC of 0.95. The superior performance of XGBoost indicates its robustness in handling complex genetic data and its potential utility in clinical applications for early diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. The findings of this study underscore the importance of advanced machine learning techniques in genomics and suggest that integrating such models into healthcare systems could significantly enhance predictive diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.