Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40680035›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Ration or compassion? Stakeholder perspectives on the introduction of bedaquiline in South Africa.

Rene Raad, Graeme Hoddinott, Martin Gorsky, Justin Dixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rene RaadDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8726-3548
Graeme HoddinottDesmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Martin GorskyCentre for History in Public Health, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-3696
Justin DixonDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health emergency that poses a significant challenge to disease control efforts that rely on antibiotics. Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is a major contributor to global AMR, but its management has historically often remained confined to TB-specific discussions. The emergence of bedaquiline (BDQ), the first novel TB drug in decades, is a moment of potential confluence between AMR and DR-TB. By examining the period between 2012 and 2018, when BDQ was made available for DR-TB in South Africa, this study explores how the introduction of this novel drug foregrounded tensions between antimicrobial access and stewardship in resource-constrained settings. Through qualitative interviews with doctors, policymakers, patients, and activists in the context of DR-TB policy, programming, and care delivery, we explore how these stakeholders balanced the imperative to expand access to this critical new antibiotic and the imperative to ensure its longevity. South Africa, we show, adopted a liberal approach to access to BDQ, grounded in a compassionate care approach that represented a significant shift from the country's traditional drug rationing aimed at mitigating the spread of DR-TB. We document the numerous obstacles that were faced in enabling compassionate use, as well as the broader implications of South Africa's liberal BDQ policy both for TB management in South Africa and for global AMR strategies. The BDQ experience suggests that integrating compassionate care into stewardship models can yield positive public health outcomes, challenging some of the foundational assumptions underlying stewardship. In the process, it suggests that a third, balanced strategy is available that explicitly integrates equitable access with robust stewardship to fulfil both immediate and long-term public health goals.

Identifiers

PMID40680035
PMCPMC12273958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.