ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Ration or compassion? Stakeholder perspectives on the introduction of bedaquiline in South Africa.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bedaquiline Resistance in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Emerging Trends.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health emergency that poses a significant challenge to disease control efforts that rely on antibiotics. Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is a major contributor to global AMR, but its management has historically often remained confined to TB-specific discussions. The emergence of bedaquiline (BDQ), the first novel TB drug in decades, is a moment of potential confluence between AMR and DR-TB. By examining the period between 2012 and 2018, when BDQ was made available for DR-TB in South Africa, this study explores how the introduction of this novel drug foregrounded tensions between antimicrobial access and stewardship in resource-constrained settings. Through qualitative interviews with doctors, policymakers, patients, and activists in the context of DR-TB policy, programming, and care delivery, we explore how these stakeholders balanced the imperative to expand access to this critical new antibiotic and the imperative to ensure its longevity. South Africa, we show, adopted a liberal approach to access to BDQ, grounded in a compassionate care approach that represented a significant shift from the country's traditional drug rationing aimed at mitigating the spread of DR-TB. We document the numerous obstacles that were faced in enabling compassionate use, as well as the broader implications of South Africa's liberal BDQ policy both for TB management in South Africa and for global AMR strategies. The BDQ experience suggests that integrating compassionate care into stewardship models can yield positive public health outcomes, challenging some of the foundational assumptions underlying stewardship. In the process, it suggests that a third, balanced strategy is available that explicitly integrates equitable access with robust stewardship to fulfil both immediate and long-term public health goals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.