ArticlePloS one2025
Indicator from the graph Laplacian of stock market time series cross-sections can precisely determine the durations of market crashes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quasi-differentiation and its applications to noisy time series data from complex systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stock market crashes are believed to occur unpredictably and have profound negative impacts on the economy and society. However, there is no universally agreed-upon definition of stock market crashes, whether it is an actual market state (implying that there is a start and an end) or just a transition between two different states (implying that it is a point event). Conventionally, extreme events in the financial markets can be determined using various change-point detection methods. However, these methods typically rely on a model of the time series data and/or use sliding time windows. Expanding on our previous work, we propose an alternative way of defining market crashes as short states by utilizing information cross-filtering by two time windows of the time derivative of the maximum Laplacian spectral gap across filtration parameters [Formula: see text]. When we applied this method to analyze the time derivative of the maximum spectral gap for S&P 500, Nikkei 225, SGX and TWSE, we found persistent peaks (found across different time window widths) associated with the COVID-19 crash starting in March 2020 and ending only in April 2020. These dates correspond roughly with the highest point before the crash and the lowest point after the crash seen in the indices. We also found non-persistent peaks (found only across short time windows or long time windows) before and after the COVID-19 crash. The explanations for these non-persistent peaks are peculiar to individual markets, and also particular market crashes such as the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. Based on this work, we argue that a definition of market crash in terms of a duration is more natural and perhaps more useful for risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.