Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679977›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism.

Felicity Bishop, Jeremy Howick, Jane Vennik, Jennifer Bostock, Paul Little, Christian Mallen, Leanne Morrison, Mary Steele, Beth Stuart, Stephanie Hughes and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Felicity BishopSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662
Jeremy HowickFaculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-7206
Jane VennikPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Jennifer BostockPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9261-9350
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Christian MallenSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Leanne MorrisonSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Mary SteelePrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-3855
Beth StuartPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Stephanie HughesPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Kirsten SmithPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Mohana RatnapalanPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Emily LynessPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Hajira Dambha-MillerPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Riya TiwariSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Clare Lockyer-StevensPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Hazel EverittPrimary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients can benefit when primary care practitioners communicate clinical empathy and optimism during consultations, but previous training interventions for practitioners are overly time-consuming and evidence on patient outcomes is limited. This study assessed the feasibility of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in UK general practice to evaluate effects of a new brief digital learning package in empathy and optimism (EMPathicO) for primary care practitioners.

methodsThe study ran January to October 2020, with COVID-19 related modifications (mostly, practitioner and patient data had to be collected separately) from March 2020. 9 practices and 12 primary care practitioners recruited from UK (Southern England, Midlands). 12 practitioners completed EMPathicO training and 11 completed qualitative telephone interviews. Patients recruited through social media completed web-based questionnaires at baseline (<2 weeks post-consultation) and 2-week follow-up (n = 437). Purposively sampled patients completed qualitative telephone interviews (n = 30). Data analysed descriptively and thematically.

resultsPractitioners were keen to reflect on and enhance communication skills and were willing to undertake digital training, even during COVID-19 pandemic. However, some practices and practitioners would have declined if video-recording consultations was a mandatory aid to reflection during training. Practitioners found EMPathicO brief, relevant and engaging and could implement techniques taught in the training. Patients found the online questionnaires acceptable, though retention was suboptimal at 57%; minor easily remedied feasibility and process issues were identified (including incentivizing participation); and patients were enthusiastic about research to improve communication.

conclusionsAn agile research strategy enabled useful feasibility data to be collected despite the challenges of the COVID pandemic. It is feasible to proceed to a full trial of the effects of EMPathicO on patient outcomes in primary care, if video-recording consultations is optional not mandatory. Feasibility work to develop and test sophisticated questionnaire structures is valuable when planning primary care patient surveys. Registration: ISRCTN21215037. Registered: 06/02/2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21215037.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19EmpathyOptimismPhysicians, Primary CareAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40679977
PMCPMC12273914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.