ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Chemical composition of floral perfumes in Mormodes (Orchidaceae): implications for selective attraction of euglossine bees.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracing Species Boundaries Through Genomic Baits: Diagnostic SNP Panels for Genotyping Orchid Pollinaria.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Wild origins, cultivated undertones: floral scent variation in Vanilla planifolia Andrews.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Colors for Resources: Reward-Linked Visual Displays in Orchids.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe genus Mormodes (Catasetinae) comprises ∼80 Neotropical orchid species, predominantly from the Amazon. Like other Catasetinae, these orchids offer floral perfumes as their sole reward to specialized pollinators - male euglossine bees (Apidae). Growing as epiphytes on tall, usually dead trees, Mormodes plants pose challenges for studying their natural history. Consequently, little is known about its pollinator interactions and perfume chemistry. Studies on related genera suggest that species-specific perfume blends are critical for attracting distinct euglossine species. Here, we present the first extensive ecological and chemical study of Mormodes, testing whether perfume variation is associated with differences in pollinator spectra and may function as a prezygotic reproductive barrier.
methodsFloral perfumes of ten species were collected via dynamic headspace and analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Floral visitors were captured on flowers in a region of high Mormodes diversity in the Amazon forest, northern Brazil. KEY
resultsWe identified 139 compounds in the floral perfumes of Mormodes spp., with species-specific profiles. While six species exhibited sesquiterpene-dominated bouquets, three species were dominated by aromatic compounds and one by monoterpenes. In the floral visitor survey, we reported ten species of Euglossa, four of Eulaema and one each of Exaerete, Aglae and Eufriesea. Some Mormodes species had exclusive pollinator spectra, while others shared pollinators.
conclusionsUnlike most Catasetinae perfumes, typically dominated by monoterpenes or aromatics, Mormodes perfumes are mostly sesquiterpene-based, a trend that may represent a third evolutionary trajectory within the subtribe. Species-specific chemical profiles were associated with distinct pollinator spectra, while similar bouquets resulted in pollinator sharing. These results highlight the key role of floral perfume chemistry in selective pollinator attraction and reproductive isolation. However, in species producing similar perfume chemistry and attracting the same pollinators, additional isolating mechanisms, such as floral morphology and phenology, might be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.