ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Deep learning-based automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm with high-resolution computed tomography: impact of the combination of tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDetecting small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) is challenging owing to their difficulty in being identified as distinct tumor masses. This study assesses the diagnostic performance of a three-dimensional convolutional neural network for the automatic detection of small PDAC using both automatic tumor mass detection and indirect indicator evaluation. MATERIALS AND
methodsHigh-resolution contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans from 181 patients diagnosed with PDAC (diameter ≤ 2 cm) between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed. The D/P ratio, which is the cross-sectional area of the MPD to that of the pancreatic parenchyma, was identified as an indirect indicator. A total of 204 patient data sets including 104 normal controls were analyzed for automatic tumor mass detection and D/P ratio evaluation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were evaluated to detect tumor mass. The sensitivity of PDAC detection was compared with that of the software and radiologists, and tumor localization accuracy was validated against endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) findings.
resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for tumor mass detection were 77.0%, 76.0%, 75.5%, and 77.5%, respectively; for D/P ratio detection, 87.0%, 94.2%, 93.5%, and 88.3%, respectively; and for combined tumor mass and D/P ratio detections, 96.0%, 70.2%, 75.6%, and 94.8%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the software's sensitivity and that of the radiologist's report (software, 96.0%; radiologist, 96.0%; p = 1). The concordance rate between software findings and EUS was 96.0%.
conclusionsCombining indirect indicator evaluation with tumor mass detection may improve small PDAC detection accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.