ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Evaluating changes in hypoglossal nerve stimulator use over time and long-term adherence.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Responder-Based Outcomes and Between-Study Heterogeneity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Recent Advancements in the Clinical Pathway of Respiration-Synchronized Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEvaluate patient phenotypes and longitudinal patterns of hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) use and identify predictors of long-term HGNS adherence.
methodsPatients who underwent HGNS implantation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) from 2017 to 2023 and had available data through 9 months post-device activation were included. Adherence rate was defined as percentage of patients using the device for at least 4 h for 70% of nights. Repeated measures ANOVA and Cochran's Q tests were used to analyze changes in HGNS use over time. A k-means clustering analysis was used to identify HGNS user subgroups with shared characteristics and associations with HGNS use.
resultsA total of 59 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 62.7 (11.2) years, mean (SD) body mass index of 28.5 kg/m2 (3.2), and an average pre-operative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 38.7 events/hour; the majority were male (78%) and White (98.3%). Patients used their HGNS devices on average for 81.1% of nights (SD 23.5%) and 362 min/night (SD 115), with 0.96 (SD 1.4) pauses/night at 9 months post-activation. The mean percentage of nights and the time/night used decreased significantly over the first 9 months (p < 0.001 for both), while pauses/night increased (p = 0.008). The estimated adherence rate was 52.5% at 9 months. The cluster analysis revealed subgroups with shared characteristics; however, clusters were not associated with HGNS use.
conclusionsHGNS use appears to decrease over the first nine months after activation. Additional research is warranted to investigate drivers of HGNS use decrement. Given lack of a standardized definition for adherence, future studies should report more granular HGNS use metrics to facilitate comparison across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.