ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025
Identifying multiple sclerosis in women of childbearing age in six European countries: a contribution from the ConcePTION project.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has increased over the last decades, primarily among women of childbearing age. Several algorithms for identifying MS have been described in the literature, providing heterogeneous prevalence estimates. We compared five algorithms to identify MS in women of childbearing age and estimated MS prevalence by time period and age-group. The study population included women aged 15 to 49 years-old between 2005 and 2019, from three data sources including all women (from Italy, Norway, and Wales), and three including pregnant women only (from France, Finland, and Spain; data collected around pregnancy). Five algorithms were tested: MS1 to MS3 combined MS diagnoses and MS-medicine prescriptions/dispensations, requiring 1, 2, or 3 occurrences, respectively; MS4 and MS5 used only MS diagnoses, requiring at least 2 occurrences (MS4 allowed just 1 if diagnosis was from inpatient care). In 2015-2019, MS prevalence based on MS1 ranged from 109 to 359 per 100,000 women: 109 in France, 121 in Spain, 195 in Wales, 232 in Finland, 264 in Italy, and 359 in Norway. More restrictive algorithms led to greater disparity, with MS3 ranging from 53 in Spain to 325 in Norway, and MS5 from 21 in France to 345 in Norway. All algorithms showed expected prevalence trends by time and age among women of childbearing age, though lower than in the literature. Overall, MS1 provided prevalence estimates most closely aligned with existing literature. This study offers key insights into choosing algorithms for identifying MS in women of childbearing age and in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.