ReviewMolecular neurobiology2025
Deciphering Molecular and Signaling Pathways of Extracellular Vesicles-Based Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding neuroinflammation: the critical role of NLRP3 inflammasome in Alzheimer's disease.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- C16-siRNAs in Focus: Development of ALN-APP, a Promising RNAi-Based Therapeutic for Alzheimer's Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapidly growing aging population and increasing risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) necessitate the development of more effective therapeutic strategies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic avenue for AD. EVs, including exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies, are lipid bilayer-enclosed particles secreted by various cells that mediate intercellular communication through the transfer of proteins, lipids, RNA, and other bioactive molecules. EVs have various advantages over traditional therapeutic strategies, including high bioavailability, exceptional biocompatibility, and low immunogenicity. There are various methods for extraction and isolation of EVs to ensure reproducibility and characterization. Amyloid plaque formation, tau hyperphosphorylation, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and synaptic loss in AD are efficiently ameliorated using EVs. Moreover, signaling pathways are reported to be altered in AD, which have also been found to be regulated by EVs to promote neuronal growth and survival, including NFκB, MAPK, NLRP3, Nrf2/Keap1, HO-1, and TFAM. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that EVs derived from various sources, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and immune cells, can attenuate AD pathology by reducing amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation, mitigating tau hyperphosphorylation, enhancing autophagy, and promoting synaptic plasticity. EV-based therapies for AD are in early clinical evaluation, with ongoing trials assessing their safety and efficacy. Key challenges include dosing, biodistribution, large-scale production, and immune responses. Despite these hurdles, EVs offer a promising, non-invasive alternative to stem cell therapy with lower risks and improved targeting potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40679697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.