ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Lactobacillus plantarum and supernatant: vaginal health and reproductive parameters of ewes synchronized with fluorogestone or medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of intravaginal probiotics and enrofloxacin on vaginal microbiota, pH, vaginitis, and fertility in black Iraqi goats synchronized with progesterone impregnated sponges.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Comparative Effects of Intravaginal Progesterone Sponge Durations (Short vs. Long Duration) With or Without Probiotics on Vaginal Microbiota Balance and Reproductive Performance in Black Iraqi Goats.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum (LAC) and its cell-free supernatant (CFS) on vaginal health and reproductive performance in ewes. The ewes were synchronized using fluorogestone acetate (FGA) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) impregnated intravaginal sponges. A total of 196 Merino ewes were randomly assigned to four groups in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Intravaginal sponges remained for 14 days, and vaginal discharge, sponge weight change, estrus response, and pregnancy rates were evaluated. No adverse health effects were observed following intravaginal probiotic treatment. There was a tendency (p = 0.07) for higher sponge loss in the FGA group (13.2%) compared to the MPA group (5.7%). On the day of sponge removal, 90.8% of ewes exhibited vaginal discharge. Although not statistically significant, mean vaginal discharge scores were lower in LAC-treated groups compared to CFS-treated groups. While L. plantarum had no significant effect on vaginal discharge scores in the MPA group (40.7% in MPA + LAC vs. 41.7% in MPA + CFS for score 2; p > 0.05), it significantly reduced purulent/hemorrhagic discharge in the FGA group (29.7% in FGA + LAC vs. 47.6% in FGA + CFS; p < 0.05). Estrus initiation occurred significantly earlier in the FGA group (36.8 ± 1.9 h) compared to the MPA group (49.1 ± 1.2 h; p < 0.01), although neither the probiotic treatment nor its interaction with progestagen type significantly influenced estrus timing. Pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the FGA + LAC (71.7%) and FGA + CFS (75.6%) groups compared to the MPA + LAC (49.0%) and MPA + CFS (50.0%) groups (p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that FGA-based synchronization improves pregnancy rates, while treatment with L. plantarum may enhance vaginal health, providing a potential non-antibiotic approach for reproductive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40679696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.