Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2025
Performance and operative outcomes' evaluation of a hand-held articulating laparoscopic device: a prospective clinical trial on the HandX™ platform.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Using a Handheld Motorized Articulating System: Technical Description and Initial Outcomes.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical technique of articulated instruments in endoscopic (ARTISTIC) mastectomy: bridging the gap in minimally invasive breast surgery.Gland surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of laparoscopic surgery has revolutionized general surgery, yet ergonomic limitations of conventional instruments persist. Robotic platforms have addressed some of these issues but are hindered by high costs and complexity. Hand-held articulating laparoscopic instruments offer a potential intermediary solution. This study assesses the HandX device performance and post-operative outcomes. This prospective, single-arm trial enrolled 60 patients intended for elective minimally invasive abdominal surgery from March 2018 to January 2022 at Assuta Medical Center and Shamir Medical Center. The study evaluated the hand-held device performance, deficiencies, conversion rate, and post-operative complications within a minimum of 14 days. Sixty patients underwent MIS using the evaluated device without conversion to conventional instruments. The predominant indication for surgery was abdominal wall hernia (48.3%), followed by cholecystectomy (15%). The mean System Usability Scale for evaluating device performance was 84.9, indicating high usability. One device deficiency was noted. No intraoperative complications or device-related post-operative morbidity were observed. Postoperative complications included one superficial surgical site infection and non-device-related medical events. The HandX device exhibits a favorable user experience with no device-related morbidity. Hand-held articulating devices offer a valuable intermediary between conventional laparoscopic instruments and robotic platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40679691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.