Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679686›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Identification of sperm parameters linked to fertility and development of fertility prediction models for zebu (Bos indicus) and crossbred (Bos taurus X Bos indicus) cattle bulls.

Kishan Kumar Fataniya, Arumugam Kumaresan, Anand Kumar Yadav, John Peter Ebenezer Samuel King, Muniandy Sivaram, Thirumala Rao Talluri, Ayyasamy Manimaran, Gowdar Veerappa Vedamurthy, Sakthivel Jeyakumar, Sakshi Payasi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kishan Kumar FataniyaTheriogenology Laboratory, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7687-5057
Arumugam KumaresanTheriogenology Laboratory, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India. ogkumaresan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-3477
Anand Kumar YadavTheriogenology Laboratory, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7286-2324
John Peter Ebenezer Samuel KingTheriogenology Laboratory, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0648-8505
Muniandy SivaramDairy Economics, Statistics and Management Division, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-5287
Thirumala Rao TalluriTheriogenology Laboratory, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-3545
Ayyasamy ManimaranDairy Production Section, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-2711
Gowdar Veerappa VedamurthyDairy Production Section, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7538-5035
Sakthivel JeyakumarDairy Production Section, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-4016
Sakshi PayasiDairy Production Section, Southern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Adugodi, Bengaluru, 560030, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2954-6516

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research Indian Council of Agricultural Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy rates in cattle have shown a declining trend over recent years, possibly due to various factors, including reduced sperm quality. Breeding centres require a reliable method to distinguish high-fertility bulls based on sperm quality. This study aimed to examine sperm parameters in bulls of known fertility, with the objective of determining whether sperm parameters linked to fertility vary across breeds. Frozen semen from breeding bulls (n = 106) of known fertility (Holstein Friesian crossbred, n = 20; Jersey crossbred, n = 40; Karan Fries, n = 12; Sahiwal, n = 16; Kankrej, n = 18) were thawed and sperm samples were analysed for kinematic parameters (computer assisted sperm analysis), plasma membrane integrity, acrosome integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), intracellular calcium, mitochondrial ROS, protein tyrosine phosphorylation (PTP) and DNA fragmentation index (DFI%). Multivariate data analysis (Principal component analysis, multiple linear regression, step wise regression) was performed to identify sperm parameter related to fertility. Pearson bivariate correlations were made on the parameters of interest. Breed of bull significantly affected the relationship between sperm parameters and bull fertility. Principal component analysis biplot revealed that fertility related sperm parameters of indigenous cattle and crossbred cattle tended to cluster distinctly. In Holstein Friesian crossbred bulls, the model consisting of moribund, MMP, live Ca negative and PTP positive spermatozoa predicted bull fertility with an accuracy of 91%. In Jersey crossbred bulls, DFI(%) and MMP alone could explain 61% variations in the bull fertility. In Sahiwal bulls, live Ca negative, linearity, DFI(%) and ALH were able to explain 89% variations in bull fertility. In Karan Fries, PTP positive, DFI(%) and progressive motility explained a total of 86% variations in bull fertility. In case of Kankrej bulls, live Ca negative and ROS positive spermatozoa explained 41% variation in bull fertility. In conclusion, sperm parameters explaining the variability in bull fertility differ among breeds, and the breed specific fertility prediction models developed in the study have the potential to discriminate above- from below-average fertility bulls.

Indexed as

FertilitySemen AnalysisSpermatozoaAnimalsBreedingCattleMaleMembrane Potential, MitochondrialSemen PreservationSperm MotilityBreed variationBull fertility prediction modelsPCASperm parameters

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.