Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679679›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025

Covalent and Non-Covalent BTK Inhibition in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment.

Pratik V Shah, Douglas E Gladstone

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pratik V ShahDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Zuckerberg Cancer Center, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Douglas E GladstoneDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Zuckerberg Cancer Center, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY, USA. dgladstone@northwell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementBruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are transforming chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment. Given the availability of both covalent and non-covalent BTK inhibitors (BTKis) CLL treatment has become more nuanced. Here the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and resistance patterns associated with both inhibitor classes are reviewed to help create a framework for integrating covalent and non-covalent BTKis into CLL treatment algorithms. Our treatment algorithm based on the available data is as follows, in the frontline setting when oral therapy is preferred/chosen and indefinite therapy is not a deterrent, irrespective of DNA and IGVH mutational status, a second-generation covalent BTK inhibitor (cBTKi) is recommended. In the relapsed/refractory setting when oral therapy is preferred a second-generation cBTKi is preferred. For those suffering disease progression during second generation cBTK, it is recommended to change to an alternative cBTKi and for those exposed to greater than two lines of therapy, challenging to a non-covalent BTKi (ncBTKi) in the form of pirtobrutinib. At the time of disease progression on a BTKi, we recommend testing for resistance mutations. Data on combination therapy's role and time-limited BTKi use remain under active investigation.

Indexed as

Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellProtein Kinase InhibitorsDisease ManagementDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationTreatment OutcomeAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsBTK protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsBruton Tyrosine Kinase InhibitorChronic lymphocytic leukemia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.