ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025
Covalent and Non-Covalent BTK Inhibition in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focal adhesion kinase FAK interplays with ROR1 in the aggressiveness of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- More than an attachment module: covalent inhibitor warheads influence BTK dynamics and function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanistic Considerations Across Relapsing and Progressive Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pirtobrutinib in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Navigating Resistance and the Personalisation of BTK-Targeted Therapy.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementBruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are transforming chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment. Given the availability of both covalent and non-covalent BTK inhibitors (BTKis) CLL treatment has become more nuanced. Here the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and resistance patterns associated with both inhibitor classes are reviewed to help create a framework for integrating covalent and non-covalent BTKis into CLL treatment algorithms. Our treatment algorithm based on the available data is as follows, in the frontline setting when oral therapy is preferred/chosen and indefinite therapy is not a deterrent, irrespective of DNA and IGVH mutational status, a second-generation covalent BTK inhibitor (cBTKi) is recommended. In the relapsed/refractory setting when oral therapy is preferred a second-generation cBTKi is preferred. For those suffering disease progression during second generation cBTK, it is recommended to change to an alternative cBTKi and for those exposed to greater than two lines of therapy, challenging to a non-covalent BTKi (ncBTKi) in the form of pirtobrutinib. At the time of disease progression on a BTKi, we recommend testing for resistance mutations. Data on combination therapy's role and time-limited BTKi use remain under active investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40679679What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.