ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Effects of supplemental betaine isolated or in combination with soybean hulls on growth performance, body composition, and metabolic status of young growing pigs.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Dietary Betaine on Growth Performance, Serum Metabolites, and Meat Quality of Pigs: A Meta-Analysis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To study the interaction between betaine (BET) and soybean hulls (SBH) on growth performance, body composition, and metabolic status of young growing pigs, 24 barrows with initial body weight (BW) of 29.51 ± 3.24 kg were allotted to one of four dietary treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with two levels of BET (0 and 1 g/kg) and SBH (0 and 150 g/kg) for 28 days. Pig BW and feed disappearance were recorded at 14-day intervals. Real-time ultrasonic measurements, as well as jugular blood samples, were obtained initially and on day 28 for all pigs. There was no SBH x BET interaction for growth responses. Pig growth was unaffected by BET supplementation. Dietary SBH addition decreased (P < 0.001) growth rate, as well as feed and energy intakes, which resulted in lighter pigs (P < 0.01) at the end of the study. The inclusion of BET in diets without SBH increased (P < 0.05) loin area and fat-free lean gain, whereas the dietary addition of SBH decreased (P ≤ 0.038) body protein and fat contents. Dietary BET supplementation did not impact the metabolic status of pigs, but feeding SBH increased globulin content (P = 0.039) and decreased albumin-to-globulin ratio (P = 0.023). In conclusion, adding supplemental BET to diets with SBH did not alter nutrient partitioning in young growing pigs, but feeding 150 g/kg SBH lead to slow growth rates and metabolic inefficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40679676What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.