SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Using digital technology to support wellbeing and independence among people living with incurable cancers: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this systematic review is to summarise and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of using digital technology to deliver physical activity and/or nutrition interventions to promote wellbeing and independence among adults with advanced or incurable cancer.
methodsSystematic structured searches for any experimental study exploring physical activity and/or nutrition intervention delivery with digital technology were conducted in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All records were screened, extracted, and quality assessed by two authors. Main outcomes were feasibility and acceptability of using technology to help deliver interventions, with secondary outcomes of potential efficacy in any measure of quality of life, wellbeing, or function.
resultTwenty-nine eligible studies were included. Digital interventions were mostly feasible and acceptable, with high retention rates and participant satisfaction. Many participants expressed willingness to recommend the interventions to others or continue use. Engagement rates were generally high, although fewer studies addressed diet and nutrition than exercise and physical activity interventions.
conclusionDigital supportive care interventions may be feasible, well-accepted, and tolerated by individuals with incurable cancer. These platforms could effectively improve this population's support for physical activity and symptom management. However, the heterogeneity in study designs highlights the exploratory nature of these interventions. To advance the field, future research should focus on adequately powered studies, improved generalisability, and standardised tools for measuring outcomes.
trial registrationThis trial has been prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021295936).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.