Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679644›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Comparative evaluation of ChatGPT and LLaMA for reliability, quality, and accuracy in familial Mediterranean fever.

Aslıhan Uzun Bektaş, Balahan Bora, Erbil Ünsal

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aslıhan Uzun BektaşDepartment of Pediatric Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. aslihan.uzun@deu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-2228
Balahan BoraDepartment of Pediatric Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6193-0402
Erbil ÜnsalDepartment of Pediatric Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8800-0800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is the most common monogenic autoinflammatory disease. Large language models (LLMs) offer rapid access to medical information. This study evaluated and compared the reliability, quality, and accuracy of ChatGPT-4o and LLaMA-3.1 for FMF. Single Hub and Access Point for Paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines were used for question generation and also for answer validation. Thirty-one questions were developed from a clinician's perspective based on the related guidelines. Two pediatric rheumatologists with over 20 years of FMF experience independently and blindly evaluated the responses. Reliability, quality, and accuracy were assessed using the modified DISCERN Scale, Global Quality Score, and the guidelines, respectively. Readability was assessed using multiple established indices. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test to assess normality, followed by paired t-tests for normally distributed scores, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for non-normally distributed scores. Both models demonstrated moderate reliability and high response quality. In terms of alignment with the guidelines, LLaMA provided fully aligned, complete, and accurate responses to 51.6% (16/31) of the questions, whereas ChatGPT provided such responses to 80.6% (25/31). While 9.7% (4/31) of LLaMA's responses were entirely contradictory to the guidelines, ChatGPT did not produce any such responses. ChatGPT outperformed LLaMA in terms of accuracy, quality, and reliability, with statistical significance. Readability assessments showed that both LLMs required college-level understanding.

conclusionWhile LLMs show great promise, current limitations in accuracy and guideline adherence mean they should supplement, not replace, clinical expertise. CLINICAL

trial registrationThis study does not involve clinical trials; therefore, no clinical trial registration is required. WHAT IS KNOWN: •FMF is the most common hereditary autoinflammatory disease. LLMs are increasingly used to provide clinical information. WHAT IS NEW: •This is the first study to assess two different LLMs in the context of FMF, evaluating their reliability, quality, and alignment with clinical guidelines. ChatGPT-4o outperformed LLaMA-3.1 in reliability,quality, and guideline alignment for FMF. However, both models showed informational gaps that may limit their clinical use.

Indexed as

Familial Mediterranean FeverChildGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicReproducibility of ResultsRheumatologySurveys and QuestionnairesAccuracyArtificial intelligenceChatGPTFamilial Mediterranean feverLLaMAReliability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.