Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679633›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025

Intraoperative differentiation of pancreatic neoplastic lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Markus Kist, Paul Strenge, Tobias Keck, Andreas Weber, Peter Bronsert, Thaer S A Abdalla, Ulrich Friedrich Wellner, Michael Thomaschewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Markus Kist *Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. markus.kist@uksh.de.
Paul Strenge *Medical Laser Center Lübeck GmbH, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Tobias KeckDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. Tobias.Keck@uksh.de.
Andreas WeberCore Facility for Histopathology and Digital Pathology, Medical Center- University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter BronsertCore Facility for Histopathology and Digital Pathology, Medical Center- University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Thaer S A AbdallaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Ulrich Friedrich WellnerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Michael ThomaschewskiDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe diagnostic methods for accurately differentiating the dignity of pancreatic neoplasms are limited. Worrisome features on MRI and endosonography guide the way to resection or conservative treatment with a relevant rate of failure. Intraoperative minimal invasive optical coherence tomography could be a solution for this challenge. The aim of this study is to investigate whether optical coherence tomography is suitable for differentiating of pancreatic neoplastic lesions.

methodsIn this exploratory study, four patient's specimens of pancreatic resections (white adipose tissue, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) based on IPMN and neuroendocrine pancreatic carcinoma) were prospectively examined ex vivo immediately after resection in the operating room using an optical coherence tomography system (Callisto 930nm, Thorlabs GmbH). In detail, the study investigated whether and in what way endocrine tumors, adenocarcinomas, premalignant and benign cysts differ morphologically in optical coherence tomography imaging compared to healthy pancreatic tissue. The final histopathological findings of the pancreatic specimens served as a reference and were correlated.

resultsThe samples examined ranged from typical fatty tissue, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), a moderate differentiated (G2) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) based on an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and a neuroendocrine pancreatic carcinoma. Optical coherence tomography was feasible to replicate key histological characteristics and tissue architecture in correlation to conventional Hematoxylin-eosin histology.

conclusionOptical coherence tomography imaging has the potential to differentiate between benign, pre-malignant and malignant pancreatic pathologies by morphology and should be examined in larger collectives.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyProspective StudiesIPMNOptical coherence tomographyPanNETPDAC

Identifiers

PMID40679633
PMCPMC12274226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.