ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Feasibility and accuracy of the fully automated three-dimensional echocardiography right ventricular quantification software in children: validation against cardiac magnetic resonance.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have confirmed that fully automated three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) right ventricular (RV) quantification software can accurately assess adult RV function. However, data on its accuracy in children are scarce.
objectiveThis study aimed to test the accuracy of the software in children using cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study prospectively enrolled 82 children who underwent both echocardiography and cardiac MR within 24 h. The RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF) were obtained using the novel 3DE-RV quantification software and compared with cardiac MR values across different groups.
resultsThe novel 3DE-RV quantification software was feasible in all 82 children (100%). Fully automated analysis was achieved in 35% patients with an analysis time of 8 ± 2 s and 100% reproducibility. Manual editing was necessary in the remaining 65% patients. The 3DE-derived RV volumes and EF correlated well with cardiac MR measurements (RVEDV, r=0.93; RVESV, r=0.90; RVEF, r=0.82; all P <0.001). Although the automated approach slightly underestimated RV volumes and overestimated RVEF compared with cardiac MR in the entire cohort, the bias was smaller in children with RVEF ≥ 45%, normal RV size, and good 3DE image quality.
conclusionFully automated 3DE-RV quantification software provided accurate and completely reproducible results in 35% children without any adjustment. The RV volumes and EF measured using the automated 3DE method correlated well with those from cardiac MR, especially in children with RVEF ≥ 45%, normal RV size, and good 3DE image quality. Therefore, the novel automated 3DE method may achieve rapid and accurate assessment of RV function in children with normal heart anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.