ReviewEuropean heart journal2025
Physiological pacing: mechanisms, clinical indications, and perspectives.
Review in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rosenbaum Syndrome Successfully Treated With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Rate Versus Rhythm Control in a Multimorbid Patient With Tachy-Brady Syndrome: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Pacing Dependency.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Bachmann's bundle pacing: toward physiologic atrial activation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Left bundle branch pacing is a superior pacing strategy compared to left ventricular septal pacing: insights from the pooled clinical evidence.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Normal cardiac function depends on a highly efficient cardiac conduction system. Conduction system disease impairs cardiac function, which can reduce exercise capacity, cause symptoms such as breathlessness and fatigue, and, if severe, result in syncope and death. Pacemakers were originally developed to treat profound bradycardia caused by complete heart block. However, pacing the right ventricle leads to non-physiological activation of the ventricular myocardium, reducing global cardiac performance. Early developments in physiological pacing focused on promoting intrinsic activation, delivering more physiological heart rate responses during exercise, and co-ordinating atrial and ventricular activation. More recently, the focus has shifted to delivering pacing which preserves or restores normal ventricular activation patterns, including atrio-biventricular pacing, conduction system pacing by His-bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing, left septal pacing, and Bachmann's bundle pacing. Adoption of these more physiological approaches might reduce the adverse effects of pacing, as well as expanding pacing indications to treatment of other forms of conduction system disease. This paper reviews the evolving field of physiological pacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.