Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679603›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Capsular bag performance of an aspheric hydrophobic IOL after conventional phacoemulsification or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: 12-month results of a randomized prospective study.

Marina Casazza, Sophia Anna Reifeltshammer, Nino Hirnschall, Jascha Wendelstein, Siegfried Mariacher, Peter Laubichler, René Siska, Matthias Bolz

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marina CasazzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, Graz, 8010, Austria. marina.casazza@medunigraz.at.
Sophia Anna ReifeltshammerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Nino HirnschallDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Jascha WendelsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Siegfried MariacherPrivate Practice, Landeck and Innsbruck, Austria.
Peter LaubichlerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
René SiskaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Matthias BolzDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate a new hydrophobic aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) regarding its refractive and position stability after conventional (CCS) or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

methodsAll patients received the same IOL (CT LUCIA 621P, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany). Both eyes of each patient were randomized, with one eye assigned to the FLACS group and the other eye to the CCS group. One, 6 and 12 months after surgery, 2 different swept-source optical coherence tomography measurements (IOLMaster 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany and CASIA-2, Tomey GmbH, Japan) were performed as well as subjective refraction, best corrected (BCDVA) and uncorrected visual acuity (UDVA).

resultsA total of 74 eyes of 37 patients were included in this study. Mean postoperative BCDVA for the FLACS and CCS group was - 0.08 ± 0.08 logMAR and 0.08 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively. Overall, mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error (ME) was 0.48 ± 0.38dpt and 0.42 ± 0.44dpt respectively with no differences between groups (p = 0.559 and p = 0.786). Overall, tilt magnitude was stable in all groups over the course of 12 months with a mean tilt magnitude of 4.48 ± 2.48° at 12 months. Postoperative patient satisfaction was high with 97.3% of all patients very or fairly satisfied with the outcome.

conclusionThere was no significant difference between groups regarding postoperative stability and capsular bag performance as well as refractive error over the course of 12 months. The CT LUCIA 621P demonstrated good efficacy, safety and stability. No issues regarding biocompatibility of the IOL material were observed.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyLens Capsule, CrystallineLenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationPseudophakiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMaleMiddle AgedCataractFemtolaser assisted cataract surgeryIntraocular lensIntraocular lens stability

Identifiers

PMID40679603
PMCPMC12583352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.