ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Treatment burden in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: an in-depth interview survey.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a lifelong, clonal hematologic disease posing life-threatening risks if untreated. The prognosis for PNH has improved with the advent of C5 inhibitors, which are now the standard of care where available. As treatment options continue to expand, healthcare providers can better address both PNH management and the impact of treatment on patients' daily lives. To investigate the burden of disease and key factors taken into consideration when patients with PNH choose their preferred treatment, we conducted an in-depth patient interview survey. Of survey participants (N = 30), 70.0% were receiving intravenous C5 inhibitors. Notably, 56.7% of all patients reported needing ≥ 1 hospital visit per month, and 46.7% required a day off from work or school for visits (33.3% among those receiving intravenous C5 inhibitors). A frequently reported burden of PNH treatment was financial concern, including the cost of treatment, hospital visits, and the negative impact on income. Additionally, burden related to waiting times and distance from the hospital and the overall time spent on outpatient PNH care were identified with similar results for patients receiving intravenous C5 inhibitors. These results suggest that the time and effort to get to treatment centers and the time required to receive treatment for PNH were critical unmet needs in PNH care. Our study indicates that persistent burdens associated with current PNH care should be taken into account alongside therapeutic effectiveness when making treatment decisions. Further analysis with a larger sample size is required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.