ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
Self-reported quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy-a prospective cohort study.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) has been developed to assess patient-reported recovery 24 h after non-cardiac surgery. This prospective cohort study sought to analyze patient-reported recovery throughout day five after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy (RARP).
methodsBetween June 2022 and February 2023 adult patients, who were scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy, completed the German version of the QoR-15 (QoR-15GE) preoperatively to establish a baseline value. Between postoperative day one and day five, patients completed the QoR-15GE daily until the day of discharge.
resultsA total of 523 patients completed the questionnaires. On postoperative day one QoR-15GE scores were significantly lower after RARP compared with ORP (ORP: 113 ± 22 vs. RARP: 107 ± 24; p = 0.006) with a higher decline in postoperative QoR-15GE scores in RARP compared with ORP patients (ORP: 27 ± 20 vs. RARP: 32 ± 23; p = 0.006). The multivariable analysis confirmed an influence of surgical technique (Estimate: 4.39; 95% CI [0.27; 8.50], p = 0.037) on postoperative quality of recovery after adjusting for clinically relevant variables. Irrespective of surgical technique, we observed a consistent increase in QoR-15GE scores with similar recovery scores on postoperative days three, four, and five.
conclusionPatients who undergo RARP experience poorer postoperative recovery at postoperative days one and two compared to those undergoing ORP. However, recovery scores align from postoperative day three, indicating a similar level of patient-reported recovery before hospital discharge. These findings suggest that the QoR-15GE may be appropriate for serial assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.