ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
Biological Function Assignment across Taxonomic Levels in Mass-Spectrometry-Based Metaproteomics via a Modified Expectation Maximization Algorithm.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fiber-Degrading Microorganisms: Types, Screening and Applications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Taxonomic-Level Protein Quantification in Metaproteomics Using a Biomass-Constrained Expectation-Maximization Approach.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge in mass-spectrometry-based metaproteomics is accurately identifying and quantifying biological functions across the full taxonomic lineage of microorganisms. This issue stems from what we refer to as the "shared confidently identified peptide problem″. To address this issue, most metaproteomics tools rely on the lowest common ancestor (LCA) algorithm to assign biological functions, which often leads to incomplete biological function assignments across the full taxonomic lineage of identified microorganisms. To overcome this limitation, we implemented an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, along with a biological function database, within the MiCId workflow. Using synthetic datasets, our study demonstrates that the enhanced MiCId workflow achieves better control over false discoveries and improved accuracy in microorganism identification and biomass estimation compared to Unipept and MetaGOmics. Additionally, the updated MiCId offers improved accuracy and better control of false discoveries in biological function identification compared to Unipept, along with reliable computation of function abundances across the full taxonomic lineage of identified microorganisms. Reanalyzing human oral and gut microbiome datasets using the enhanced MiCId workflow, we show that the results are consistent with those reported in the original publications, which were analyzed using the Galaxy-P platform with MEGAN5 and the MetaPro-IQ approach with Unipept, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.