ArticleGeospatial health2025
Associations between rocky mountain spotted fever and veterinary care access, climatic factors and landscape in the State of Arizona, USA.
Article in Geospatial health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 'teabag method': tick feeding protocol and the effects of tick feeding on hematological parameters in the canine host.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Spatial Risk Factors of Vector-Borne Diseases in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: A Scoping Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF) is a potentially fatal tick-borne disease historically prevalent in the eastern and southeastern U.S. Since the early 2000s, there has been a notable rise in RMSF cases in the south-western U.S. Despite the documented role of dogs in tick-borne disease transmission, research on the influence of other factors, such as veterinary care access, climatic conditions and landscape characteristics on RMSF incidence is limited. This study investigated the combined impact of these factors on RMSF using county-level temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, land cover, dog populations and veterinary care access in Arizona from 2006 to 2021. Employing a spatial negative binomial regression model, the study revealed significant associations between veterinary care access, precipitation, relative humidity, shrubland, and RMSF incidence across three models incorporating lagged effects (0-month, 1-month, and 2-month) for climatic variables. A key finding was that counties experiencing higher veterinary care access were more likely to report lower RMSF case counts (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.9237). The mean precipitation consistently showed the highest positive IRR (1.8137) across all models, indicating its strong influence. In contrast, relative humidity (IRR: 0.9413) and shrubland presence (IRR: 0.9265) demonstrated significant negative associations with RMSF incidence. These findings underscore the importance of veterinary care access, climatic factors, and land cover in shaping RMSF dynamics, particularly in regions with increasing incidence rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.