SynthesisJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025
The Utility of Fat Grafting to Manage Burn Scars: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing fat graft survival: from adipose-derived stem cell mechanisms to next-generation regenerative strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary management of thermal injuries remains a challenging and relevant topic for plastic and nonplastic burn surgeons alike. Burn scars are associated with both functional limitations and aesthetic challenges for patients. While various treatment modalities exist for the management of these scars, no gold standard has been established. Fat grafting has been used in various reconstructive contexts, and studies have demonstrated improvement in skin texture and contour following infiltration. This systematic review aims to examine the available evidence on outcomes following fat grafting for the management of burn scars. A search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted from their inception until November 2024. Published articles examining outcomes of fat grafting for thermal injury scars were identified, screened, and data were extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 10 740 articles were screened, yielding 14 eligible studies for data extraction, accounting for 885 patients. All studies reported improvement of scars postoperatively. Nine out of 14 studies used a subjective clinical assessment, 1 study did not report pretreatment measurements, and the other 8 studies all found improved outcomes based on clinician assessment. One study reported Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores and another reported modified VSS scores. Three studies utilized POSAS and the mean difference was an improvement of 7.28 (MCID <1). This review suggests that autologous fat grafting and adipose-derived stem cells show promising results for improving scar quality, function, and patient satisfaction following burn injury. Further studies, particularly prospective in nature, with standardized outcome measurements are needed to substantiate subjective clinical improvement. The authors recommend utilizing POSAS or VSS for future studies investigating burn scar treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.