Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679398›Full record

ArticleGenetics2025

Global epistasis in budding yeast driven by many natural variants whose effects scale with fitness.

Ilan Goldstein, Joseph J Hale, Ian M Ehrenreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ilan GoldsteinMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.
Joseph J HaleMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.
Ian M EhrenreichMolecular and Computational Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.

Funding

Characterizing the complex underpinnings of genetic background effectsR35GM130381 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Ian Michael Ehrenreich · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130381NIH HHSUniversity of Southern California
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global epistasis is a phenomenon in which the effects of genetic perturbations depend on the fitness of the individuals in which they occur. In populations with natural genetic variation, global epistasis arises from interactions between perturbations and polymorphic loci that are mediated by fitness. To investigate the prevalence and characteristics of loci involved in these interactions in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we used combinatorial DNA barcode sequencing to measure the fitness of 169 cross progeny (segregants) subjected to 8,126 CRISPRi perturbations across 2 environments. Global epistasis was evident in these data, with more fit segregants within each environment exhibiting greater sensitivity to genetic perturbations than less fit segregants. We dissected the genetic basis of this global epistasis by scanning the genome for loci whose effects covary with CRISPRi-induced reductions in population fitness. This approach identified 58 loci that interact with fitness, most of which exhibited larger effects in the absence of genetic perturbations. In aggregate, these loci explained the observed global epistasis in each environment and demonstrated that the loci contributing to global epistasis largely overlap with those influencing fitness in unperturbed conditions.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomycetalesbackground effectsfitnessgenetic interactionsgenetic perturbationsglobal epistasisnatural genetic variation

Identifiers

PMID40679398
PMCPMC12505298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.