ArticleBiology open2025
The impact of size and ontogeny on suction feeding kinematics in the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum).
Article in Biology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of metamorphosis and size on the aquatic feeding kinematics of the Iberian ribbed newt (Pleurodeles waltl Michahelles, 1830).Biology open · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the major skull myology of the giant stem-amphibian Mastodonsaurus: A case study for early tetrapods.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Size impacts all aspects of life in animals. Not only does it impact metabolism and physiology, it also affects movements, resulting in different selective pressures on animals of diverse sizes. However, beyond size, differences in developmental stage may also impact movements due to the maturation of the nervous and musculoskeletal systems. Here, we tested the influence of size and ontogeny on suction feeding kinematics in adults, juveniles, and larvae of the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) using high-speed video recordings. Our data show that size had an influence on nearly all kinematic variables examined, but kinematics often deviated from the predictions of simple geometric scaling models. Moreover, for both the velocity and acceleration of mouth and hyoid movements, the effect of size differed according to the developmental stage. While overall movements were faster in larger animals, the velocity of movement increased faster with size in adults. This could be explained by the fact that the skull undergoes changes at adulthood due to partial remodeling. Changes in velocity are possibly linked to a shift in diet at adulthood from static to more elusive prey, yet this remains to be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.