ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025
An undergraduate learning assistant perspective on career development.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Undergraduate learning assistant (ULA) programs are widely recognized for their positive impact on student engagement, academic performance, and classroom inclusion in large-enrollment STEM courses. However, far less attention has been given to the professional development of the ULAs themselves. This perspective paper accompanies the article "Implementing an undergraduate learning assistant model to foster engagement and professional development in microbiology courses" (K. A. Popichak, P. E. Gruber, E. L. Suchman, and J. L. McLean, J Microbiol Biol Educ:e00042-25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00042-25), which details a structured and replicable ULA program implemented at Colorado State University. Drawing from my personal experience as a ULA in this program, I explore how pedagogical training, structured mentorship, and active teaching responsibilities supported my development in science communication, leadership, and career exploration. Unlike many peer-led teaching models, this program centers the dual benefit of ULAs both as instructional aides and as developing professionals. This paper expands the conversation around ULA programs by emphasizing the need to treat undergraduate teaching roles not only as service to peers but also as high-impact opportunities for skill-building and identity formation. Through reflective analysis, I argue that programs like the one described by Popichak et al. fill a critical gap in STEM education by preparing undergraduates for future roles in research, education, and public outreach. Broader adoption of such models could enhance both student success and the career readiness of those facilitating it. Together, this perspective and the accompanying curriculum paper offer a roadmap for universities to reimagine ULA programs as a mutually beneficial strategy for teaching, mentorship, and professional development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.