Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679238›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2025

From Ambition to Action: Navigating Obstacles and Opportunities of "Safe and Sustainable by Design".

Joanke van Dijk, Anežka Sharma, Bernd Nowack, Zhanyun Wang, Martin Scheringer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deciphering the Chemical Footprint of Renewables.Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities: Time for a Reboot.Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanke van DijkTechnology and Society Laboratory, Empa─Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014 St Gallen, Switzerland.
Anežka SharmaRECETOX, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Bernd NowackTechnology and Society Laboratory, Empa─Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014 St Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-112X
Zhanyun WangTechnology and Society Laboratory, Empa─Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014 St Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9914-7659
Martin ScheringerRECETOX, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0809-7826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the introduction of "Safe and Sustainable by Design" (SSbD), momentum is created in Europe to shift from the reactive (mis)management of chemicals and materials toward a more proactive design and assessment approach to preventing pollution issues. SSbD is expected to steer the innovation process toward a green and sustainable industrial transition, substitute or minimize the production and use of substances of concern, and minimize the impact on health and the environment throughout the chemical/material life cycle. The European Commission has recommended a framework for operationalizing SSbD, but many open questions remain regarding its feasibility and implementation. Our analysis suggests that despite its potential, the EU SSbD framework in its current form cannot deliver on set ambitions. Suitable assessment methods are not available in many cases, and the complexity and data requirements of SSbD may hinder widespread adoption or result in paralysis by analysis. Moving forward, a more realistic, agile framework, accompanied by clear, simplified methods, and robust support for stakeholders, should be developed to ensure that SSbD principles are fully integrated into practice, leading to truly safer and more sustainable chemicals and materials. We further highlight opportunities to address identified gaps, establish such a framework, and enhance its operationalization.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEnvironmental Pollutionchemical innovationchemicals managementregrettable substitutionsafe and sustainable by designSSbD

Identifiers

PMID40679238
PMCPMC12312151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.