ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2025
The Application of Six Sigma to Assess the Analytical Performance of Plasma Proteins and Design a Risk-Based Statistical Quality Control Strategy: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study applied the six sigma model to evaluate plasma protein testing performance in six laboratories, with customized quality control programs and targeted improvements introduced where necessary.
methodsInternal quality control (IQC) and external quality assessment (EQA) data for plasma proteins were gathered from six laboratories. Sigma values for each analyte were determined based on the coefficient of variation (CV), bias, and total allowable error (TEa). Using six sigma performance verification charts, we calibrated analyte performance and, guided by Westgard sigma rules, batch length, and quality goal index (QGI), developed laboratory-specific quality control schemes and improvement plans.
resultsDespite standardized platforms and reagents, sigma values showed significant inter-laboratory variation, with some differences also observed within labs at varying analyte concentrations. For projects with sigma < 6, tailored quality control measures were implemented, leading to marked performance improvements.
conclusionThe six sigma model provides an objective framework for evaluating plasma protein test performance and enhancing quality. It enables quantitative assessment of laboratory management and supports the development and implementation of customized, risk-based statistical quality control (SQC) strategies and improvement measures across multiple laboratory systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.