Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40679144›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025

Investigation of the Therapeutic Potential of Boric Acid in Enteritis-Induced Quails.

Sultan Aslan, Ulku G Simsek, Hatice Eroksuz, Burcu Karagulle, Mehmet Eroglu, Gokhan K Incili, Canan A Incili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sultan AslanDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8480-1515
Ulku G SimsekDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Hatice EroksuzDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Burcu KaragulleDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Mehmet ErogluDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Siirt University, Siirt, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9471-6410
Gokhan K InciliDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Canan A InciliDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.

Funding

Fırat University Scientific Research and Projects Unit VF.19.09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of boric acid added to feed and water on intestinal histopathology, immune parameters, and intestinal bacterial flora in experimentally enteritis-induced Japanese quails. Eighty-four quails were used in the study, which were divided into seven groups. The following groups were used in the study: control (G1), infected (G2), infected + antibiotic (G3), infected + boric acid added to feed (100 mg/kg) (G4), infected + boric acid added to feed (300 mg/kg) (G5), infected + boric acid added into water (100 mg/L) (G6) and infected + boric acid added into water (300 mg/L) (G7). Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA, and differences between groups were determined by Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The highest levels of white blood cells were found in the infection group, whereas the lowest levels were found in the control group (p < 0.05). Boric acid taken with water decreased the number of Enterobacteriaceae, Escherchia coli, and total mesophilic aerobic bacteria. However, these differences were not significant compared with the infection group (p > 0.05). Compared to the Infected group (G2), the most notable reductions in coliform counts were observed in the boric acid water 300 mg/L group (G7), which decreased from 3.29 to 2.90 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), and in the 100 mg/L group (G6), which showed a decrease to 2.93 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), In contrast, boric acid given in feed (G4 and G5) had no significant effect on any bacterial count compared to the infected group p > 0.05). Consequently, Effective results were observed when boric acid was added to drinking water, even with short-term (7 days) use. Boron derivatives could provide an effective alternative treatment option, especially in combating the growing antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Boric AcidsCoturnixEnteritisPoultry DiseasesAnimal FeedAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Bacterial Agentsboric acidBoric Acidsantibioticboric acidenteritishealthintestine

Identifiers

PMID40679144
PMCPMC12272505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.