Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678928›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2025

Interpretable-AI-Based Model Structural Transfer Learning to Accelerate Bioprocess Model Construction.

Alexander W Rogers, Fernando Vega-Ramon, Amanda Lane, Philip Martin, Dongda Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander W RogersDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-6520
Fernando Vega-RamonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Amanda LaneUnilever R&D Port Sunlight, Wirral, Liverpool, UK.
Philip MartinDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Dongda ZhangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-4618

Funding

This study was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Unilever.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining accurate kinetic models for new biochemical systems is time-intensive, requiring experimental data collection, model construction, validation, and discrimination. Traditional black-box machine learning-based transfer learning methods leverage prior knowledge but lack interpretability and physical insights. To address this, we propose a novel model structural transfer learning approach that combines symbolic regression with artificial neural network feature attribution. The method enables automatic structural modification of an inaccurate or low-fidelity mechanistic model developed for one system when being applied to another system. Through a comprehensive in silico case study, our framework successfully adapted a kinetic model from one biochemical system to a different but related one, improving predictive accuracy. Moreover, the framework can significantly accelerate model identification when being integrated with model-based design of experiments. By comparing the old and new model structures, physical insight can be obtained, altogether highlighting the framework's potential for advancing automated knowledge discovery and facilitating high-fidelity predictive digital twin design for novel biochemical processes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalComputer SimulationNeural Networks, Computerbioprocess kineticsdigital twininterpretable machine learningknowledge discoverymodel‐based design of experiments

Identifiers

PMID40678928
PMCPMC12417796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.