ArticleAllergy2025
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Allergen Immunotherapy: An Evidence-Based Approach.
Article in Allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-Course Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Birch Pollen Allergoids: Consistent Clinical and Immunological Improvements.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of the tree sublingual immunotherapy tablet in the subpopulation of Canadian children with allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis: phase III trial results.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Toward personalized prediction: a multicenter machine learning model for omalizumab response duration in moderate-to-severe perennial allergic rhinitis.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRegulatory authorities recommend a combination of symptom and medication scores during the grass pollen season as a primary endpoint for Phase III allergen immunotherapy (AIT) trials targeting allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. However, many composite primary endpoint scales exist; none are validated, nor do they have a well-justified minimal clinically important difference (MCID).
methodsDirect patient feedback from 1071 grass-allergic patients was obtained to determine the minimally relevant improvement in allergic symptoms and translated into an MCID for the EAACI recommended CSMS
results69% of grass-allergic patients were satisfied with a 1-point-improvement (e.g., from "severe" to "moderate") in their most severe symptom. This translated into an MCID range for CSMS
conclusionsBoth patient feedback and RESONATE results support an average MCID of -0.22 points on the CSMS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.