Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678861›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Intercomparison of methods for estimating leaf inclination angle distribution with terrestrial lidar for broadleaf tree species.

Chris Mutugi Murithi, Jan Pisek, Daniel Schraik, Brian N Bailey, Jing Liu, Atticus E L Stovall, Matheus Boni Vicari, Guang Zheng, Andrew Skidmore

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chris Mutugi MurithiTartu Observatory, University of Tartu, 61602, Tõravere, Estonia.
Jan PisekTartu Observatory, University of Tartu, 61602, Tõravere, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-0396-2072
Daniel SchraikNatural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-3918
Brian N BaileyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-2324
Jing LiuKey Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, (Nanjing Normal University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing, 210023, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5207-7614
Atticus E L StovallEarth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9512-3318
Matheus Boni VicariMantis-AI, São Paulo, SP, 04003-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8841-4205
Guang ZhengInternational Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, 210023, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4118-7804
Andrew SkidmoreFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6344-9273

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur PRG1405Estonian Ministry of Education and Research TKT232H2020 European Research Council 771049H2020 European Research Council 834709NASA NNH20ZDA001N-BIODIVNational Institute of Food and Agriculture 1013396National Natural Science Foundation of China 42001284Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20241884U.S. National Science Foundation IOS 2047628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf inclination angle distribution (LIAD) is a fundamental parameter of models that illustrate the energy and mass exchanges for vegetation at all scales. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) instruments have emerged as valuable tools for acquiring detailed measurements of canopy structure. Here, we present the first intercomparison of the available LIAD estimation techniques using TLS data. The available LIAD estimation techniques were evaluated using TLS point clouds of both real and synthetic trees covering the full range of the existing LIAD types. The performance of the proposed TLS-based methods was also compared with the established, non-TLS-based leveled digital photography approach. The study highlighted that the algorithms that used merged point clouds performed better than their single-scan counterparts. TLS offered a more comprehensive representation of the canopy structure and overcame the limitations of the traditional leveled digital photography approach for both real and simulated trees. This study may serve as a template for establishing benchmark datasets, evaluation protocols, and accessibility of algorithms that could facilitate systematic comparisons of LIAD estimation algorithms. This collaborative effort promotes fairness, reproducibility, and the advancement of LIAD estimation techniques by enabling researchers to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement in their algorithms.

Indexed as

LasersPlant LeavesRemote Sensing TechnologyTreesAlgorithmsPhotographySpecies Specificity3Dleaf inclination angle distribution (LIAD)leveled digital photography (LDP)light detection and ranging (LiDAR)terrestrial laser scanning (TLS)

Identifiers

PMID40678861
PMCPMC12409099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.