ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Intercomparison of methods for estimating leaf inclination angle distribution with terrestrial lidar for broadleaf tree species.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leaf inclination angle distribution (LIAD) is a fundamental parameter of models that illustrate the energy and mass exchanges for vegetation at all scales. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) instruments have emerged as valuable tools for acquiring detailed measurements of canopy structure. Here, we present the first intercomparison of the available LIAD estimation techniques using TLS data. The available LIAD estimation techniques were evaluated using TLS point clouds of both real and synthetic trees covering the full range of the existing LIAD types. The performance of the proposed TLS-based methods was also compared with the established, non-TLS-based leveled digital photography approach. The study highlighted that the algorithms that used merged point clouds performed better than their single-scan counterparts. TLS offered a more comprehensive representation of the canopy structure and overcame the limitations of the traditional leveled digital photography approach for both real and simulated trees. This study may serve as a template for establishing benchmark datasets, evaluation protocols, and accessibility of algorithms that could facilitate systematic comparisons of LIAD estimation algorithms. This collaborative effort promotes fairness, reproducibility, and the advancement of LIAD estimation techniques by enabling researchers to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement in their algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.