ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Insights Into Patient-Level Exposure to Actionable Pharmacogenomic Medications in Australia Using a New National Pharmacogenomic Guideline.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dispensing of actionable pharmacogenetic drugs among adults receiving cardiovascular disease medications in the Northern Netherlands: A serial cross-sectional study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomic-Guided Prescribing for Treatment-Resistant Mental Health Conditions in Australian Primary Care: A Single-GP Practice Retrospective Observation of 29 Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Australian Public's Awareness, Knowledge and Perspectives Towards Pharmacogenomics: A Nationwide Survey, and Semi-Structured Interviews.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Clinical and Economic Impact of Expanded TPMT Testing to Prevent Thiopurine-Induced Myelosuppression in Australia: A Budget Impact Analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the use of 35 pharmacogenomic (PGx) medications listed in the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) guideline, estimated the potential costs of subsidizing PGx testing in Australia, and predicted related prescribing changes. Using administrative claims data from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, accessed via the Australian Bureau of Statistics DataLab, we identified individuals who received any of the 35 medications between January 2021 and December 2023. Incident prescribing rates were calculated for children (0-17), adults (18-64), and older adults (65+). Adults (14.91%) and older adults (14.44%) had the highest rates of PGx medication use, followed by children (3.53%). Commonly prescribed medications included proton pump inhibitors, with frequent associations to genes such as CYP2C19 across all age groups. Estimated costs of PGx testing, assuming 50% and 75% population uptake, were highest for older adults: AUD$1.95 million and AUD$2.93 million, respectively. Predicted prescribing changes, based on literature-reported phenotype frequencies by ancestry, suggested that up to 18.58% of individuals using drugs like clopidogrel or voriconazole may need alternative treatments due to poor metabolism. These findings highlight the clinical potential of integrating PGx testing into routine practice, especially for medications included in international pharmacogenomic guidelines. While implementation would entail significant upfront costs, PGx testing could enhance medication safety and effectiveness and health care cost-efficiency. Future research should focus on scalable strategies for PGx implementation across diverse health care settings to optimize patient care globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.