Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678853›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025

Tensile strength testing in feline skin with different sizes of nylon suture material: a biomechanical in vitro study.

Diana Joos, Tomasz Bartkowiak, Hubert Jopek, Pavel Slunsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diana JoosAniCura Small Animal Specialists Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-8541-7415
Tomasz BartkowiakInstitute of Mechanical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4715-6358
Hubert JopekInstitute of Applied Mechanics, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-1047
Pavel SlunskyUniversity of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0558-1484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesThis in vitro study aimed to evaluate the failure loads and failure types of sutured feline skin samples using different sizes of nylon (polyamide 6/6.6) suture material.MethodsA total of 88 skin samples from the lateral thorax and abdomen of 11 cadaveric cats were harvested using an hourglass-shaped template. In total, 80 samples from 10 cats were bisected and sutured with three simple interrupted sutures using randomly assigned nylon suture sizes (2-0, 3-0, 4-0 and 5-0 USP). Control samples remained intact. Uniaxial tensile tests were performed using a universal testing machine. Failure load and failure type were recorded and analysed. Failure mechanisms were classified as either suture material failure or tissue failure, with tissue failure defined as linear tears perpendicular to the suture line at the penetration site.ResultsSuture size significantly influenced failure load. No significant reduction in force was observed between 2-0 and 3-0 (

Indexed as

NylonsSkinSuturesSuture TechniquesTensile StrengthAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverCatsMaterials TestingNylonsnylonpolyamide 6/6.6Skin suturetensile strength

Identifiers

PMID40678853
PMCPMC12276484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.