Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40678782›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Mutual human-robot understanding for a robot-enhanced society: the crucial development of shared embodied cognition.

Giulio Sandini, Alessandra Sciutti, Pietro Morasso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulio SandiniCOgNiTive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies Research Unit, Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Research Unit - Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy.
Alessandra SciuttiCOgNiTive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies Research Unit, Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Research Unit - Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy.
Pietro MorassoCOgNiTive Architecture for Collaborative Technologies Research Unit, Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Research Unit - Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conception of autonomous, intelligent, collaborative robots has been the subject of science fiction rather than science in the second half of the previous century, with practical applications limited to industrial machines without any level of autonomous, intelligent, and collaborative capacity. The new century is facing the challenge of pressing industrial and social revolutions (4, 5, 6, …) with the prospect of infiltrating robots in every sector of human society; however, this dissemination will be possible if and only if acceptable degrees of autonomy, intelligence, and collaborative capacity can be achieved. Scientific and technological innovations are needed within a highly multidisciplinary framework, with a critical integration strategy and functional characterization that must ask a fundamental question: the design of autonomous, intelligent, collaborative robots should aim at a unified single template to be mass-produced including a standard setup procedure for the functional adaptation of any single prototype, or should the design aim at "baby" robots with a minimal set of sensory-motor-cognitive capabilities as the starting point of a training and educational process in close connection with human companions (masters, partners, final users)? The former alternative is supported by EAI, i.e., the Embodied variant of the Artificial Intelligence family of computational tools based on large foundation models. The latter alternative is bio-inspired; namely, it attempts to replicate the computational structure of Embodied Cognitive Science. Both formulations imply embodiment as a core issue. Still, we think this concept has a markedly different meaning and practical implications in the two cases, although we are still far away from the practical implementations of either roadmap. In this opinion paper, we explain why we think the bio-inspired approach is better than the EAI approach in providing a feasible roadmap for developing autonomous, intelligent, collaborative robots. In particular, we focus on the importance of collaborative human-robot interactions conceived in a general sense, ranging from haptic interactions in joint physical efforts (e.g., loading/unloading) to cognitive interactions for joint strategic planning of complex tasks. We envision this type of collaboration only made possible by a deep human-robot mutual understanding based on a structural equivalence of their embodied cognitive architecture, based on an active, first-person acquisition of experience rather than a passive download of third-person knowledge.

Indexed as

developmental psychologyecological psychologyembodied artificial intelligenceembodied cognitive scienceenaction theoryextended mind hypothesisprospectionsimulation theory of cognition

Identifiers

PMID40678782
PMCPMC12269773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.